Ignite PP - Anuvahood

Grade - C- 

EBI

- I need to go in to more detail with why the racial stereotypes are used. 
- I need to add more theories in to the presentation. 
- I need to be careful with how little/how much information I add to the slides. 
- I need to add more images to the presentation. 
- Use knowledge of media. 

WWW

- I had good presentation skills. 
- I had good time management. 
- I didn't used notes when presenting.
- I had good interaction with my audience. 

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2012/feb/19/adam-deacon-interview-bafta

This article is on how Adam Deacon won a Bafta award, and how he was up against actors like Tom Hiddleston (Thor) . Adam talks about how he felt and what it meant to him, how it you don't need a lot of money or the greatest actors to having a award winning film. he also talks about why he had racial stereotypes, and what the deeper meaning to it was. 

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/mar/10/urban-film-spoof-anuvahood-kidulthood

This article is based on how Urban British films have changed from what they used to be, nitty gritty films about how council estate youths were. It looks at how the audiences demand has changed. People see different views on humor now, having racial stereotypes enforced in the film enables it to have a humorous side to it.  

"It's very much about peer recommendation," says Taussig.
"Scoring highly on Facebook 'likes' probably means more than what a newspaper says." 
This quote shows why Anuvahood got such bad reviews from film critics, one being that they are usually quiet old, and two being that they cannot relate to what is being shown in the film. thus they have very narrow mind on what a film should be about. However, if there was to be a younger candidate that was chosen t write a review on the film, the review would be much different. 

http://www.theguardian.com/film/movie/140811/anuvahood

This was one of the shortest and most pathetic reviews I read on the film. It simply said, "A British urban spoof that is irredeemably lame and unfunny" A film review should contain more than a single sentence even if you thought the film wasn't great, there should be an explanation to why you thought this. However i think that the person that wrote this review is very narrow minded and doesn't have much knowledge of different film types. As if he/she did, they would know that a 'spoof' is meant to be silly and stupid. 

These are the only articles that i thought were relevant to the film and what I found interesting, thus I only have three from five articles.